backend/app.py

@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ CORS(app)
 # })
 # Set configuration directly on the app instance
 app.config['ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS'] = {'png', 'jpg', 'jpeg', 'gif','pdf'}
-app.config['MAX_CONTENT_LENGTH'] = 1600 * 1000 * 1000
 
 app.config["SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI"] = DB_URI
 
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ app.register_blueprint(courseBlueprint,url_prefix='/api/course')
 def send_file(filename):
     return send_from_directory(USER_UPLOADS_DIR, filename)
 
-@app.route('/courseSegment/<string:filename>/<int:page>/<string:dtype>')
+@app.route('/courseSegment/<string:filename/<int:page>/<string:dtype>>')
 def get_pdf_file_as_pages(filename: str, page: int, dtype: str):
     if dtype == 'txt':
         return send_from_directory(os.path.join(USER_UPLOADS_DIR, filename+'_parts'), f"{page}.txt")

backend/blueprints/admin/__init__.py

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 from utils .auth import auth_required, requires_role
-from flask import Blueprint, jsonify, g, url_for
+from flask import Blueprint, jsonify, g
 from db.model import User, Course, Enrollment, Chat, db
 from sqlalchemy import select, func, desc, and_
 from datetime import datetime, timedelta
@@ -138,46 +138,3 @@ def get_discussion_stats():
 
     except Exception as e:
         return jsonify({'message': f'An error occurred: {str(e)}'}), 500
-
-@admin.route('/stats/userDetail', methods=['GET'])
-@auth_required()
-@requires_role([UserRole.ADMIN])
-def get_user_details():
-    """
-    Get detailed information for all users.
-    Only accessible by admin users.
-    """
-    try:
-        current_user: User = g.current_user
-
-        # Get all users with basic info
-        users = db.session.execute(
-            select(User)
-            .order_by(desc(User.joinedDate))
-        ).scalars()
-
-        # Format user data
-        user_list = [{
-            'id': str(user.id),
-            'username': user.username,
-            'email': user.email,
-            'firstName': user.firstName,
-            'lastName': user.lastName,
-            'profilePicture': url_for('send_file', filename=current_user.pfpFilename, _external=True),
-            'bio': user.bio,
-            'role': user.role,
-            'isActivated': user.isActivated,
-            'joinedDate': user.joinedDate.isoformat(),
-            'lastOnline': user.lastOnline.isoformat(),
-            'dateOfBirth': user.dob.isoformat() if user.dob else None
-        } for user in users]
-
-        return jsonify({
-            'users': user_list,
-            'count': len(user_list)
-        }), 200
-
-    except Exception as e:
-        return jsonify({'message': f'An error occurred: {str(e)}'}), 500
-
-

backend/blueprints/chat/__init__.py

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ def create_chat():
     except Exception as e:
         return jsonify({"error": f"An error occurred: {str(e)}"}), 500
 
-@chat.route("/get", methods=["GET", "POST"])
+@chat.route("/get", methods=["GET"])
 @auth_required()
 def get_messages():
     try:

backend/blueprints/course/__init__.py

@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ def list_all_courses():
                 'creationDate': item.creationDate,
                 'coverImage': url_for('send_file', filename=item.coverImage),
                 'totalEnrolled': item.totalEnrolled,
-                'pdf0': url_for('send_file', filename=item.serverFilename),
                 'author': {
                     'id': item.author.id,
                     'firstName': item.author.firstName,
@@ -95,7 +94,7 @@ def list_all_courses():
         'data': course_list,
     })
 
-@course.route('/enroll',methods=['POST'])
+@course.route('/enroll')
 @auth_required()
 def enroll_user():
     if not request.form.get('course_uuid'):
@@ -104,14 +103,9 @@ def enroll_user():
     selected_course: Course = db.session.execute(select(Course).where(Course.id == course_uuid)).scalar()
     if not selected_course:
         return jsonify({'message': 'Course not found'}), 404
-    #make sure if user is already enrolled h/she can't enroll
-    if db.session.execute(select(Enrollment).where(and_(Enrollment.userID == g.current_user.id, Enrollment.courseID == course_uuid))).scalar():
-        return jsonify({'message': 'Already enrolled to this course'}), 400
     new_enroll: Enrollment = Enrollment(
         userID=g.current_user.id,
-        courseID=course_uuid,
+        courseID=course_uuid
-        user=g.current_user,
-        course=selected_course
     )
     try:
         selected_course.totalEnrolled = selected_course.totalEnrolled + 1
@@ -131,11 +125,9 @@ def create_course():
     pdf_file_name: str = ''
     pdf_total_pages: int = 1
     if course_uploaded_cover_image is not None:
-        print("COURSE COVER ATTACHED")
         cover_file_name: str = random_string_generator(32)+"."+course_uploaded_cover_image.filename.split('.')[-1]
         course_uploaded_cover_image.save(os.path.join(USER_UPLOADS_DIR, cover_file_name))
     if course_uploaded_pdf is not None:
-        print('PDF ATTACHED')
         pdf_file_name: str = random_string_generator(32) +"."+ course_uploaded_pdf.filename.split('.')[-1]
         course_uploaded_pdf.save(os.path.join(USER_UPLOADS_DIR, pdf_file_name))
 
@@ -177,7 +169,7 @@ def create_course():
     # chat: Chat = Chat(courseID=new_course.id) TODO: Add a welcome chat for this course
     db.session.add(new_course)
     db.session.commit()
-    return jsonify({'message': 'Course was created successfully.', 'courseID': new_course.id}), 200
+    return jsonify({'message': 'Course was created successfully.'}), 200
 
 @course.route('/update', methods=['UPDATE', 'DELETE'])
 @auth_required()
@@ -448,7 +440,7 @@ def enrolled_courses():
 
 @course.route('/myCourses')
 @auth_required()
-def my_courses():
+def enrolled_courses():
     courses: Course = db.session.execute(select(Course).where(Course.authorID == g.current_user.id)
     ).scalars()
     course_list: list[dict] = []

backend/blueprints/quiz/__init__.py

@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ import uuid
 import requests
 from flask import Blueprint, request, jsonify, g, url_for
 from uuid import UUID
-from db.model import db, User, Course, Enrollment,Chat, Quiz, QuizAttempt
+from ...db.model import db, User, Course, Enrollment,Chat, Quiz, QuizAttempt
 from utils.auth import auth_required
 import requests
 from config import SPAM_SCORE_THRESHOLD, AI_SPAM_SERVICES_MICROSERVICE, USER_UPLOADS_DIR, AI_QUIZ_SERVICES_MICROSERVICE
 from sqlalchemy import desc, select, and_
 
-quiz = Blueprint('quiz', __name__)
+quiz = Blueprint('chat', __name__)
 
 
 @quiz.route('/generate')
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ def generate_quiz():
 @auth_required()
 def get_incomplete_quiz():
     try:
-        course_id: uuid.UUID = uuid.UUID(request.form['course_id'])
+        course_id: uuid.UUID = uuid.UUID(request.args['course_id'])
     except KeyError:
         return jsonify({'message': 'course_id must be specified'}), 401
     quiz_rows: list[Quiz] = db.session.execute(select(Quiz).where(
@@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ def get_incomplete_quiz():
 
 @quiz.route('/get/allComplete')
 @auth_required()
-def get_complete_quiz():
+def get_incomplete_quiz():
     try:
-        course_id: uuid.UUID = uuid.UUID(request.form['course_id'])
+        course_id: uuid.UUID = uuid.UUID(request.args['course_id'])
     except KeyError:
         return jsonify({'message': 'course_id must be specified'}), 401
     quiz_attempts: list[QuizAttempt] = db.session.execute(
@@ -150,12 +150,12 @@ def get_complete_quiz():
     }), 200
 
 
-@quiz.route('/submit',methods=['POST'])
+@quiz.route('/submit')
 @auth_required()
-def submit_quiz():
+def get_incomplete_quiz():
     try:
         answer: str = request.form['answer'].strip()
-        quiz_id: uuid.UUID = uuid.UUID(request.form['quiz_id'])
+        quiz_id: uuid.UUID = uuid.UUID(request.form['course_id'])
     except KeyError:
         return jsonify({'message': 'course_id and answer must be specified'}), 401
     quiz_already_attempted: QuizAttempt = db.session.execute(select(QuizAttempt).where(
@@ -181,10 +181,8 @@ def submit_quiz():
         isCorrect=int(is_correct)
     )
     db.session.add(new_attempt)
-
+    if Quiz.creatorUser.id == g.current_user.id:
-    if quiz_row.creatorUser.id == g.current_user.id:
+        Quiz.creatorHasAttempted = True
-        quiz_row.creatorHasAttempted = True
-
     db.session.commit()
     return jsonify({
         'message': 'Answer submitted',

backend/uploads/CrKZMGYNpfofiwwyZjzAPoAlKpJHIYYn.pdf_parts/1.txt

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
-Discrete Mathematics  ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) 
-Instructions  
-Assessment Type :  Individual Assignment  
-Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an 
-application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . 
-This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor 
-of IT degree.  
- 
-Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student  will be tested on their skills on 
-writing literature review of a topic student  have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course 
-in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with 
-application to Information Technology  and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one 
-application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a 
-complete account of  that interest.  
- 
-Student  can use the following database to find article or books.  
-             o EBSCO Databases  
-             o Emerald Insight  
-             o IBISWorld  
-             o IGI Global  
-             o ProQuest eBooks  
-             o O’Reilly Learnin g  
- 
-Student will  be exploring and analysis the application  of information technology related to the topic  
-which are identified by him/her , and he/she  must  recognise an application that can be programmed 
-into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs 
-to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the 
-algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student  must write on e 
-report on its findings.  
- 

backend/uploads/CrKZMGYNpfofiwwyZjzAPoAlKpJHIYYn.pdf_parts/2.txt

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
- 
- 
-Student  can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , 
-consult with your tutor.  
-The topic  student  group can choose from are : 
-• Number system used in Computing  
-• Logic in computing  
-• Inverse Function in Computing  
-• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n 
-• 16-bit representation  
-• Cryptography       
- 
-The written report must have the following sections:  
-1. Introduction  
-2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books  
-3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses  
- 
-4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested.  
-Write a complete account of that interest  
-5. Description of why students choose this application  
-6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of 
-flow -chart  
-7. Write an appropriate algorithm  
-8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input.  
-9. Conclusion  
-10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member  
-11. References  
- 
- 
- 
-Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday  18th May  2024, 11.59pm via Moodle.  
-The report must be:  
-1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long)  
-2. Size: A4  
-3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature  
-4. Single space  
-5. Font: Calibri, 11pt  
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/CrKZMGYNpfofiwwyZjzAPoAlKpJHIYYn.pdf_parts/3.txt

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Deduction, Late Submission and Extension  
-Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is 
-approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline.  
- 
-Plagiarism  
-Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the 
-statement:  
- 
-“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for 
-a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases.  
-Exclusion has serious visa implications.”  
- 
-“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work 
-in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All 
-students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating 
-that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic 
-misconduct and can attract severe penalties:  
-• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied 
-from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic 
-source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.  
-• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may 
-be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” 
-• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment  is considered as plagiarism.  
- 
-Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual  Assignment)  ;  Value 50% 
- 
-Criteria  Fail 
-(0 – 49%)  Pass  
-(50 – 64%)  Credit  
-(65 – 74%)  Distinction  
-(75 – 84%)  High Distinction  
-(85 – 100%)  
-Understanding of the 
-Topic  
-4 marks  
- Inaccurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Basic 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description of 
-the Topic and 
-some 
-connections 
-with 
-Information 
-Technology  Polished 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic 
-and 
-references to 
-Information 
-Technology  

backend/uploads/CrKZMGYNpfofiwwyZjzAPoAlKpJHIYYn.pdf_parts/4.txt

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Evidence of depth of 
-research with reference  
-6 marks  Little or no 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references 
-with 
-explanations 
-of 
-connections 
-to the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-references and 
-clear 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-refere nces 
-and polished 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  
-Identifying an application 
-of Information 
-Technology relevant to 
-the topic  
-2 mark  Little or no 
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Basic  
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Accurate 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology     Detail and 
-complete 
-account of 
-application 
-of the topic 
-to the 
-information 
-technology  
-Understanding of the  
-Information technology 
-application(s)  
-6 marks  Inaccurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Basic 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description of 
-application of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and some 
-connections 
-with relevant 
-topics     Polished 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and 
-references to 
-relevant 
-theories  
-Detail description of the 
-choice of the application  
-7 marks  Little or no 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit.  Basic 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis and 
-complete 
-detail  

backend/uploads/CrKZMGYNpfofiwwyZjzAPoAlKpJHIYYn.pdf_parts/5.txt

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Design a plane for 
-computer 
-implementation  
-7 marks  Plane is not 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-no flow -chart 
-is given  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-flow -chart is 
-also given  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-plane is given 
-with a correct 
-flow -chart    Appropriate 
-plane with 
-correct flow -
-chart and 
-complete 
-detail is 
-given.  
-Writing an algorithm  
-7 marks  Inaccurate 
-algorithm or 
-algorithm is 
-given in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm but 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-appropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner with 
-little discussion  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate  
-manner with 
-complete 
-discussion  
-Conclusions  
-7 mark s Little or no 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Basic 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of the 
-algorithm  Complete 
-analysis and 
-justification 
-of accuracy 
-of the 
-algorithm  
-Presentation  
-1 mark  Poorly 
-organised 
-report with 
-unclear 
-structure  Well 
-organised 
-report but 
-with some 
-errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report with 
-few errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report and 
-good use of 
-tables and 
-graphs  Polished 
-report and 
-creative use 
-of tables and 
-graphs  
-Presentation  
-5 marks  Poor quality 
-of slides  or 
-poor 
-performance 
-of 
-presentation  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-but some 
-error  Well 
-prepared  
-presentation 
-but one or 
-two error  Well prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-correctly  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-explicitly  
-with quality.  

backend/uploads/CrKZMGYNpfofiwwyZjzAPoAlKpJHIYYn.pdf_parts/6.txt

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Total Mark:     / 25  
- 
-25% 
- COMMENTS:  
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/CyPqrZgrAeCMNWawSfEvwJFTxgaLuJav.pdf_parts/1.txt

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
-Discrete Mathematics  ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) 
-Instructions  
-Assessment Type :  Individual Assignment  
-Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an 
-application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . 
-This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor 
-of IT degree.  
- 
-Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student  will be tested on their skills on 
-writing literature review of a topic student  have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course 
-in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with 
-application to Information Technology  and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one 
-application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a 
-complete account of  that interest.  
- 
-Student  can use the following database to find article or books.  
-             o EBSCO Databases  
-             o Emerald Insight  
-             o IBISWorld  
-             o IGI Global  
-             o ProQuest eBooks  
-             o O’Reilly Learnin g  
- 
-Student will  be exploring and analysis the application  of information technology related to the topic  
-which are identified by him/her , and he/she  must  recognise an application that can be programmed 
-into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs 
-to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the 
-algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student  must write on e 
-report on its findings.  
- 

backend/uploads/CyPqrZgrAeCMNWawSfEvwJFTxgaLuJav.pdf_parts/2.txt

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
- 
- 
-Student  can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , 
-consult with your tutor.  
-The topic  student  group can choose from are : 
-• Number system used in Computing  
-• Logic in computing  
-• Inverse Function in Computing  
-• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n 
-• 16-bit representation  
-• Cryptography       
- 
-The written report must have the following sections:  
-1. Introduction  
-2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books  
-3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses  
- 
-4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested.  
-Write a complete account of that interest  
-5. Description of why students choose this application  
-6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of 
-flow -chart  
-7. Write an appropriate algorithm  
-8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input.  
-9. Conclusion  
-10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member  
-11. References  
- 
- 
- 
-Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday  18th May  2024, 11.59pm via Moodle.  
-The report must be:  
-1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long)  
-2. Size: A4  
-3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature  
-4. Single space  
-5. Font: Calibri, 11pt  
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/CyPqrZgrAeCMNWawSfEvwJFTxgaLuJav.pdf_parts/3.txt

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Deduction, Late Submission and Extension  
-Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is 
-approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline.  
- 
-Plagiarism  
-Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the 
-statement:  
- 
-“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for 
-a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases.  
-Exclusion has serious visa implications.”  
- 
-“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work 
-in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All 
-students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating 
-that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic 
-misconduct and can attract severe penalties:  
-• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied 
-from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic 
-source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.  
-• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may 
-be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” 
-• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment  is considered as plagiarism.  
- 
-Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual  Assignment)  ;  Value 50% 
- 
-Criteria  Fail 
-(0 – 49%)  Pass  
-(50 – 64%)  Credit  
-(65 – 74%)  Distinction  
-(75 – 84%)  High Distinction  
-(85 – 100%)  
-Understanding of the 
-Topic  
-4 marks  
- Inaccurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Basic 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description of 
-the Topic and 
-some 
-connections 
-with 
-Information 
-Technology  Polished 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic 
-and 
-references to 
-Information 
-Technology  

backend/uploads/CyPqrZgrAeCMNWawSfEvwJFTxgaLuJav.pdf_parts/4.txt

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Evidence of depth of 
-research with reference  
-6 marks  Little or no 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references 
-with 
-explanations 
-of 
-connections 
-to the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-references and 
-clear 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-refere nces 
-and polished 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  
-Identifying an application 
-of Information 
-Technology relevant to 
-the topic  
-2 mark  Little or no 
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Basic  
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Accurate 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology     Detail and 
-complete 
-account of 
-application 
-of the topic 
-to the 
-information 
-technology  
-Understanding of the  
-Information technology 
-application(s)  
-6 marks  Inaccurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Basic 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description of 
-application of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and some 
-connections 
-with relevant 
-topics     Polished 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and 
-references to 
-relevant 
-theories  
-Detail description of the 
-choice of the application  
-7 marks  Little or no 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit.  Basic 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis and 
-complete 
-detail  

backend/uploads/CyPqrZgrAeCMNWawSfEvwJFTxgaLuJav.pdf_parts/5.txt

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Design a plane for 
-computer 
-implementation  
-7 marks  Plane is not 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-no flow -chart 
-is given  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-flow -chart is 
-also given  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-plane is given 
-with a correct 
-flow -chart    Appropriate 
-plane with 
-correct flow -
-chart and 
-complete 
-detail is 
-given.  
-Writing an algorithm  
-7 marks  Inaccurate 
-algorithm or 
-algorithm is 
-given in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm but 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-appropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner with 
-little discussion  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate  
-manner with 
-complete 
-discussion  
-Conclusions  
-7 mark s Little or no 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Basic 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of the 
-algorithm  Complete 
-analysis and 
-justification 
-of accuracy 
-of the 
-algorithm  
-Presentation  
-1 mark  Poorly 
-organised 
-report with 
-unclear 
-structure  Well 
-organised 
-report but 
-with some 
-errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report with 
-few errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report and 
-good use of 
-tables and 
-graphs  Polished 
-report and 
-creative use 
-of tables and 
-graphs  
-Presentation  
-5 marks  Poor quality 
-of slides  or 
-poor 
-performance 
-of 
-presentation  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-but some 
-error  Well 
-prepared  
-presentation 
-but one or 
-two error  Well prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-correctly  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-explicitly  
-with quality.  

backend/uploads/CyPqrZgrAeCMNWawSfEvwJFTxgaLuJav.pdf_parts/6.txt

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Total Mark:     / 25  
- 
-25% 
- COMMENTS:  
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/TbjYLfSVjZSrBtnLxFaAoZLlRyzrHJEV.pdf_parts/1.txt

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
-Discrete Mathematics  ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) 
-Instructions  
-Assessment Type :  Individual Assignment  
-Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an 
-application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . 
-This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor 
-of IT degree.  
- 
-Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student  will be tested on their skills on 
-writing literature review of a topic student  have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course 
-in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with 
-application to Information Technology  and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one 
-application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a 
-complete account of  that interest.  
- 
-Student  can use the following database to find article or books.  
-             o EBSCO Databases  
-             o Emerald Insight  
-             o IBISWorld  
-             o IGI Global  
-             o ProQuest eBooks  
-             o O’Reilly Learnin g  
- 
-Student will  be exploring and analysis the application  of information technology related to the topic  
-which are identified by him/her , and he/she  must  recognise an application that can be programmed 
-into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs 
-to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the 
-algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student  must write on e 
-report on its findings.  
- 

backend/uploads/TbjYLfSVjZSrBtnLxFaAoZLlRyzrHJEV.pdf_parts/2.txt

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
- 
- 
-Student  can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , 
-consult with your tutor.  
-The topic  student  group can choose from are : 
-• Number system used in Computing  
-• Logic in computing  
-• Inverse Function in Computing  
-• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n 
-• 16-bit representation  
-• Cryptography       
- 
-The written report must have the following sections:  
-1. Introduction  
-2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books  
-3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses  
- 
-4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested.  
-Write a complete account of that interest  
-5. Description of why students choose this application  
-6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of 
-flow -chart  
-7. Write an appropriate algorithm  
-8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input.  
-9. Conclusion  
-10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member  
-11. References  
- 
- 
- 
-Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday  18th May  2024, 11.59pm via Moodle.  
-The report must be:  
-1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long)  
-2. Size: A4  
-3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature  
-4. Single space  
-5. Font: Calibri, 11pt  
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/TbjYLfSVjZSrBtnLxFaAoZLlRyzrHJEV.pdf_parts/3.txt

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Deduction, Late Submission and Extension  
-Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is 
-approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline.  
- 
-Plagiarism  
-Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the 
-statement:  
- 
-“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for 
-a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases.  
-Exclusion has serious visa implications.”  
- 
-“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work 
-in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All 
-students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating 
-that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic 
-misconduct and can attract severe penalties:  
-• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied 
-from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic 
-source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.  
-• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may 
-be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” 
-• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment  is considered as plagiarism.  
- 
-Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual  Assignment)  ;  Value 50% 
- 
-Criteria  Fail 
-(0 – 49%)  Pass  
-(50 – 64%)  Credit  
-(65 – 74%)  Distinction  
-(75 – 84%)  High Distinction  
-(85 – 100%)  
-Understanding of the 
-Topic  
-4 marks  
- Inaccurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Basic 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description of 
-the Topic and 
-some 
-connections 
-with 
-Information 
-Technology  Polished 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic 
-and 
-references to 
-Information 
-Technology  

backend/uploads/TbjYLfSVjZSrBtnLxFaAoZLlRyzrHJEV.pdf_parts/4.txt

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Evidence of depth of 
-research with reference  
-6 marks  Little or no 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references 
-with 
-explanations 
-of 
-connections 
-to the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-references and 
-clear 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-refere nces 
-and polished 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  
-Identifying an application 
-of Information 
-Technology relevant to 
-the topic  
-2 mark  Little or no 
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Basic  
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Accurate 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology     Detail and 
-complete 
-account of 
-application 
-of the topic 
-to the 
-information 
-technology  
-Understanding of the  
-Information technology 
-application(s)  
-6 marks  Inaccurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Basic 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description of 
-application of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and some 
-connections 
-with relevant 
-topics     Polished 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and 
-references to 
-relevant 
-theories  
-Detail description of the 
-choice of the application  
-7 marks  Little or no 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit.  Basic 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis and 
-complete 
-detail  

backend/uploads/TbjYLfSVjZSrBtnLxFaAoZLlRyzrHJEV.pdf_parts/5.txt

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Design a plane for 
-computer 
-implementation  
-7 marks  Plane is not 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-no flow -chart 
-is given  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-flow -chart is 
-also given  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-plane is given 
-with a correct 
-flow -chart    Appropriate 
-plane with 
-correct flow -
-chart and 
-complete 
-detail is 
-given.  
-Writing an algorithm  
-7 marks  Inaccurate 
-algorithm or 
-algorithm is 
-given in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm but 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-appropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner with 
-little discussion  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate  
-manner with 
-complete 
-discussion  
-Conclusions  
-7 mark s Little or no 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Basic 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of the 
-algorithm  Complete 
-analysis and 
-justification 
-of accuracy 
-of the 
-algorithm  
-Presentation  
-1 mark  Poorly 
-organised 
-report with 
-unclear 
-structure  Well 
-organised 
-report but 
-with some 
-errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report with 
-few errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report and 
-good use of 
-tables and 
-graphs  Polished 
-report and 
-creative use 
-of tables and 
-graphs  
-Presentation  
-5 marks  Poor quality 
-of slides  or 
-poor 
-performance 
-of 
-presentation  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-but some 
-error  Well 
-prepared  
-presentation 
-but one or 
-two error  Well prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-correctly  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-explicitly  
-with quality.  

backend/uploads/TbjYLfSVjZSrBtnLxFaAoZLlRyzrHJEV.pdf_parts/6.txt

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Total Mark:     / 25  
- 
-25% 
- COMMENTS:  
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/ayjGosqfWMPHKTIyeeaeGwvlRutoshUb.pdf_parts/1.txt

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
-Discrete Mathematics  ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) 
-Instructions  
-Assessment Type :  Individual Assignment  
-Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an 
-application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . 
-This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor 
-of IT degree.  
- 
-Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student  will be tested on their skills on 
-writing literature review of a topic student  have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course 
-in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with 
-application to Information Technology  and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one 
-application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a 
-complete account of  that interest.  
- 
-Student  can use the following database to find article or books.  
-             o EBSCO Databases  
-             o Emerald Insight  
-             o IBISWorld  
-             o IGI Global  
-             o ProQuest eBooks  
-             o O’Reilly Learnin g  
- 
-Student will  be exploring and analysis the application  of information technology related to the topic  
-which are identified by him/her , and he/she  must  recognise an application that can be programmed 
-into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs 
-to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the 
-algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student  must write on e 
-report on its findings.  
- 

backend/uploads/ayjGosqfWMPHKTIyeeaeGwvlRutoshUb.pdf_parts/2.txt

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
- 
- 
-Student  can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , 
-consult with your tutor.  
-The topic  student  group can choose from are : 
-• Number system used in Computing  
-• Logic in computing  
-• Inverse Function in Computing  
-• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n 
-• 16-bit representation  
-• Cryptography       
- 
-The written report must have the following sections:  
-1. Introduction  
-2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books  
-3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses  
- 
-4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested.  
-Write a complete account of that interest  
-5. Description of why students choose this application  
-6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of 
-flow -chart  
-7. Write an appropriate algorithm  
-8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input.  
-9. Conclusion  
-10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member  
-11. References  
- 
- 
- 
-Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday  18th May  2024, 11.59pm via Moodle.  
-The report must be:  
-1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long)  
-2. Size: A4  
-3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature  
-4. Single space  
-5. Font: Calibri, 11pt  
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/ayjGosqfWMPHKTIyeeaeGwvlRutoshUb.pdf_parts/3.txt

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Deduction, Late Submission and Extension  
-Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is 
-approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline.  
- 
-Plagiarism  
-Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the 
-statement:  
- 
-“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for 
-a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases.  
-Exclusion has serious visa implications.”  
- 
-“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work 
-in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All 
-students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating 
-that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic 
-misconduct and can attract severe penalties:  
-• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied 
-from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic 
-source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.  
-• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may 
-be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” 
-• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment  is considered as plagiarism.  
- 
-Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual  Assignment)  ;  Value 50% 
- 
-Criteria  Fail 
-(0 – 49%)  Pass  
-(50 – 64%)  Credit  
-(65 – 74%)  Distinction  
-(75 – 84%)  High Distinction  
-(85 – 100%)  
-Understanding of the 
-Topic  
-4 marks  
- Inaccurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Basic 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description of 
-the Topic and 
-some 
-connections 
-with 
-Information 
-Technology  Polished 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic 
-and 
-references to 
-Information 
-Technology  

backend/uploads/ayjGosqfWMPHKTIyeeaeGwvlRutoshUb.pdf_parts/4.txt

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Evidence of depth of 
-research with reference  
-6 marks  Little or no 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references 
-with 
-explanations 
-of 
-connections 
-to the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-references and 
-clear 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-refere nces 
-and polished 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  
-Identifying an application 
-of Information 
-Technology relevant to 
-the topic  
-2 mark  Little or no 
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Basic  
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Accurate 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology     Detail and 
-complete 
-account of 
-application 
-of the topic 
-to the 
-information 
-technology  
-Understanding of the  
-Information technology 
-application(s)  
-6 marks  Inaccurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Basic 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description of 
-application of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and some 
-connections 
-with relevant 
-topics     Polished 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and 
-references to 
-relevant 
-theories  
-Detail description of the 
-choice of the application  
-7 marks  Little or no 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit.  Basic 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis and 
-complete 
-detail  

backend/uploads/ayjGosqfWMPHKTIyeeaeGwvlRutoshUb.pdf_parts/5.txt

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Design a plane for 
-computer 
-implementation  
-7 marks  Plane is not 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-no flow -chart 
-is given  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-flow -chart is 
-also given  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-plane is given 
-with a correct 
-flow -chart    Appropriate 
-plane with 
-correct flow -
-chart and 
-complete 
-detail is 
-given.  
-Writing an algorithm  
-7 marks  Inaccurate 
-algorithm or 
-algorithm is 
-given in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm but 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-appropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner with 
-little discussion  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate  
-manner with 
-complete 
-discussion  
-Conclusions  
-7 mark s Little or no 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Basic 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of the 
-algorithm  Complete 
-analysis and 
-justification 
-of accuracy 
-of the 
-algorithm  
-Presentation  
-1 mark  Poorly 
-organised 
-report with 
-unclear 
-structure  Well 
-organised 
-report but 
-with some 
-errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report with 
-few errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report and 
-good use of 
-tables and 
-graphs  Polished 
-report and 
-creative use 
-of tables and 
-graphs  
-Presentation  
-5 marks  Poor quality 
-of slides  or 
-poor 
-performance 
-of 
-presentation  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-but some 
-error  Well 
-prepared  
-presentation 
-but one or 
-two error  Well prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-correctly  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-explicitly  
-with quality.  

backend/uploads/ayjGosqfWMPHKTIyeeaeGwvlRutoshUb.pdf_parts/6.txt

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Total Mark:     / 25  
- 
-25% 
- COMMENTS:  
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/gVnryGmAkJesQziGcGjqjScHCXWVqMxL.pdf_parts/1.txt

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
-Discrete Mathematics  ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) 
-Instructions  
-Assessment Type :  Individual Assignment  
-Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an 
-application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . 
-This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor 
-of IT degree.  
- 
-Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student  will be tested on their skills on 
-writing literature review of a topic student  have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course 
-in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with 
-application to Information Technology  and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one 
-application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a 
-complete account of  that interest.  
- 
-Student  can use the following database to find article or books.  
-             o EBSCO Databases  
-             o Emerald Insight  
-             o IBISWorld  
-             o IGI Global  
-             o ProQuest eBooks  
-             o O’Reilly Learnin g  
- 
-Student will  be exploring and analysis the application  of information technology related to the topic  
-which are identified by him/her , and he/she  must  recognise an application that can be programmed 
-into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs 
-to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the 
-algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student  must write on e 
-report on its findings.  
- 

backend/uploads/gVnryGmAkJesQziGcGjqjScHCXWVqMxL.pdf_parts/2.txt

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
- 
- 
- 
-Student  can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , 
-consult with your tutor.  
-The topic  student  group can choose from are : 
-• Number system used in Computing  
-• Logic in computing  
-• Inverse Function in Computing  
-• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n 
-• 16-bit representation  
-• Cryptography       
- 
-The written report must have the following sections:  
-1. Introduction  
-2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books  
-3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses  
- 
-4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested.  
-Write a complete account of that interest  
-5. Description of why students choose this application  
-6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of 
-flow -chart  
-7. Write an appropriate algorithm  
-8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input.  
-9. Conclusion  
-10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member  
-11. References  
- 
- 
- 
-Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday  18th May  2024, 11.59pm via Moodle.  
-The report must be:  
-1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long)  
-2. Size: A4  
-3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature  
-4. Single space  
-5. Font: Calibri, 11pt  
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/uploads/gVnryGmAkJesQziGcGjqjScHCXWVqMxL.pdf_parts/3.txt

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Deduction, Late Submission and Extension  
-Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is 
-approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline.  
- 
-Plagiarism  
-Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the 
-statement:  
- 
-“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for 
-a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases.  
-Exclusion has serious visa implications.”  
- 
-“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work 
-in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All 
-students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating 
-that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic 
-misconduct and can attract severe penalties:  
-• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied 
-from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic 
-source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.  
-• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may 
-be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” 
-• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment  is considered as plagiarism.  
- 
-Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual  Assignment)  ;  Value 50% 
- 
-Criteria  Fail 
-(0 – 49%)  Pass  
-(50 – 64%)  Credit  
-(65 – 74%)  Distinction  
-(75 – 84%)  High Distinction  
-(85 – 100%)  
-Understanding of the 
-Topic  
-4 marks  
- Inaccurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Basic 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic  Accurate 
-mathematical 
-description of 
-the Topic and 
-some 
-connections 
-with 
-Information 
-Technology  Polished 
-mathematical 
-description 
-of the Topic 
-and 
-references to 
-Information 
-Technology  

backend/uploads/gVnryGmAkJesQziGcGjqjScHCXWVqMxL.pdf_parts/4.txt

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Evidence of depth of 
-research with reference  
-6 marks  Little or no 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references  Some 
-relevant 
-reading and 
-references 
-with 
-explanations 
-of 
-connections 
-to the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-references and 
-clear 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  Relevant 
-reading and 
-refere nces 
-and polished 
-connections 
-illuminating 
-the Topic  
-Identifying an application 
-of Information 
-Technology relevant to 
-the topic  
-2 mark  Little or no 
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Basic  
-connection 
-between the 
-topic and the 
-application  Accurate 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-application of 
-the topic to 
-the 
-information 
-technology     Detail and 
-complete 
-account of 
-application 
-of the topic 
-to the 
-information 
-technology  
-Understanding of the  
-Information technology 
-application(s)  
-6 marks  Inaccurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Basic 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description 
-of application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology  Accurate 
-description of 
-application of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and some 
-connections 
-with relevant 
-topics     Polished 
-description 
-of 
-application 
-of 
-information 
-Technology 
-and 
-references to 
-relevant 
-theories  
-Detail description of the 
-choice of the application  
-7 marks  Little or no 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit.  Basic 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice.  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis  Accurate 
-evidence is 
-given for the 
-choice and 
-omit with 
-relevant 
-analysis and 
-complete 
-detail  

backend/uploads/gVnryGmAkJesQziGcGjqjScHCXWVqMxL.pdf_parts/5.txt

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Design a plane for 
-computer 
-implementation  
-7 marks  Plane is not 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-no flow -chart 
-is given  Plane is 
-designed in a 
-proper 
-manner and 
-flow -chart is 
-also given  Accurate and 
-comprehensive 
-plane is given 
-with a correct 
-flow -chart    Appropriate 
-plane with 
-correct flow -
-chart and 
-complete 
-detail is 
-given.  
-Writing an algorithm  
-7 marks  Inaccurate 
-algorithm or 
-algorithm is 
-given in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm but 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-appropriate 
-manner  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate 
-manner with 
-little discussion  Correct 
-algorithm 
-which is 
-written in an 
-inappropriate  
-manner with 
-complete 
-discussion  
-Conclusions  
-7 mark s Little or no 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Basic 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of 
-the algorithm  Accurate 
-evidence of 
-accuracy of the 
-algorithm  Complete 
-analysis and 
-justification 
-of accuracy 
-of the 
-algorithm  
-Presentation  
-1 mark  Poorly 
-organised 
-report with 
-unclear 
-structure  Well 
-organised 
-report but 
-with some 
-errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report with 
-few errors  Clearly 
-organised 
-report and 
-good use of 
-tables and 
-graphs  Polished 
-report and 
-creative use 
-of tables and 
-graphs  
-Presentation  
-5 marks  Poor quality 
-of slides  or 
-poor 
-performance 
-of 
-presentation  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-but some 
-error  Well 
-prepared  
-presentation 
-but one or 
-two error  Well prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-correctly  Well 
-prepared 
-presentation 
-without an 
-error and 
-explain 
-everything 
-explicitly  
-with quality.  

backend/uploads/gVnryGmAkJesQziGcGjqjScHCXWVqMxL.pdf_parts/6.txt

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
- 
- 
- Assessment 3 Instructions                                                                                                                         INT2024 
-Total Mark:     / 25  
- 
-25% 
- COMMENTS:  
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

backend/utils/utils.py

@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ class InsecurePasswordException(Exception):
 
 
 def split_pdf_into_pages_with_text(pdf_path: str, output_directory: str) -> int:
-    print("SPLIT PDF INTO PAGES WITH TEXT")
     with open(pdf_path, 'rb') as pdf_file:
         reader = PdfReader(pdf_file)
         page_counter = 1

frontend/edu-connect/src/lib/routes.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 export const routes = {
-  INDEX_PAGE : '/' ,
+  INDEX_PAGE : '/' , 
   LOGIN_ROUTES : '/auth/login',
   REGISTER_ROUTES : '/auth/register',
   DASHBOARD_ROUTE : '/admin/dashboard',