Compare commits
5 Commits
31caf3d052
...
5041d84363
Author | SHA1 | Date |
---|---|---|
|
5041d84363 | 6 months ago |
|
ac5813a0de | 6 months ago |
|
8d0ae7769a | 6 months ago |
|
c603e293da | 6 months ago |
|
5abe922b98 | 6 months ago |
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
Discrete Mathematics ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) |
||||
Instructions |
||||
Assessment Type : Individual Assignment |
||||
Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an |
||||
application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . |
||||
This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor |
||||
of IT degree. |
||||
|
||||
Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student will be tested on their skills on |
||||
writing literature review of a topic student have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course |
||||
in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with |
||||
application to Information Technology and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one |
||||
application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a |
||||
complete account of that interest. |
||||
|
||||
Student can use the following database to find article or books. |
||||
o EBSCO Databases |
||||
o Emerald Insight |
||||
o IBISWorld |
||||
o IGI Global |
||||
o ProQuest eBooks |
||||
o O’Reilly Learnin g |
||||
|
||||
Student will be exploring and analysis the application of information technology related to the topic |
||||
which are identified by him/her , and he/she must recognise an application that can be programmed |
||||
into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs |
||||
to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the |
||||
algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student must write on e |
||||
report on its findings. |
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Student can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , |
||||
consult with your tutor. |
||||
The topic student group can choose from are : |
||||
• Number system used in Computing |
||||
• Logic in computing |
||||
• Inverse Function in Computing |
||||
• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n |
||||
• 16-bit representation |
||||
• Cryptography |
||||
|
||||
The written report must have the following sections: |
||||
1. Introduction |
||||
2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books |
||||
3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses |
||||
|
||||
4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested. |
||||
Write a complete account of that interest |
||||
5. Description of why students choose this application |
||||
6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of |
||||
flow -chart |
||||
7. Write an appropriate algorithm |
||||
8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input. |
||||
9. Conclusion |
||||
10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member |
||||
11. References |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday 18th May 2024, 11.59pm via Moodle. |
||||
The report must be: |
||||
1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long) |
||||
2. Size: A4 |
||||
3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature |
||||
4. Single space |
||||
5. Font: Calibri, 11pt |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Deduction, Late Submission and Extension |
||||
Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is |
||||
approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline. |
||||
|
||||
Plagiarism |
||||
Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the |
||||
statement: |
||||
|
||||
“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for |
||||
a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases. |
||||
Exclusion has serious visa implications.” |
||||
|
||||
“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work |
||||
in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All |
||||
students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating |
||||
that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic |
||||
misconduct and can attract severe penalties: |
||||
• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied |
||||
from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic |
||||
source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines. |
||||
• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may |
||||
be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” |
||||
• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment is considered as plagiarism. |
||||
|
||||
Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual Assignment) ; Value 50% |
||||
|
||||
Criteria Fail |
||||
(0 – 49%) Pass |
||||
(50 – 64%) Credit |
||||
(65 – 74%) Distinction |
||||
(75 – 84%) High Distinction |
||||
(85 – 100%) |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Topic |
||||
4 marks |
||||
Inaccurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Basic |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description of |
||||
the Topic and |
||||
some |
||||
connections |
||||
with |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology Polished |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Evidence of depth of |
||||
research with reference |
||||
6 marks Little or no |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references |
||||
with |
||||
explanations |
||||
of |
||||
connections |
||||
to the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references and |
||||
clear |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
refere nces |
||||
and polished |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic |
||||
Identifying an application |
||||
of Information |
||||
Technology relevant to |
||||
the topic |
||||
2 mark Little or no |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Basic |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Accurate |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Detail and |
||||
complete |
||||
account of |
||||
application |
||||
of the topic |
||||
to the |
||||
information |
||||
technology |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Information technology |
||||
application(s) |
||||
6 marks Inaccurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Basic |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description of |
||||
application of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and some |
||||
connections |
||||
with relevant |
||||
topics Polished |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
relevant |
||||
theories |
||||
Detail description of the |
||||
choice of the application |
||||
7 marks Little or no |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit. Basic |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Design a plane for |
||||
computer |
||||
implementation |
||||
7 marks Plane is not |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
no flow -chart |
||||
is given Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
flow -chart is |
||||
also given Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
plane is given |
||||
with a correct |
||||
flow -chart Appropriate |
||||
plane with |
||||
correct flow - |
||||
chart and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail is |
||||
given. |
||||
Writing an algorithm |
||||
7 marks Inaccurate |
||||
algorithm or |
||||
algorithm is |
||||
given in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm but |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
appropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
little discussion Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
complete |
||||
discussion |
||||
Conclusions |
||||
7 mark s Little or no |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Basic |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of the |
||||
algorithm Complete |
||||
analysis and |
||||
justification |
||||
of accuracy |
||||
of the |
||||
algorithm |
||||
Presentation |
||||
1 mark Poorly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
unclear |
||||
structure Well |
||||
organised |
||||
report but |
||||
with some |
||||
errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
few errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report and |
||||
good use of |
||||
tables and |
||||
graphs Polished |
||||
report and |
||||
creative use |
||||
of tables and |
||||
graphs |
||||
Presentation |
||||
5 marks Poor quality |
||||
of slides or |
||||
poor |
||||
performance |
||||
of |
||||
presentation Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but some |
||||
error Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but one or |
||||
two error Well prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
correctly Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
explicitly |
||||
with quality. |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Total Mark: / 25 |
||||
|
||||
25% |
||||
COMMENTS: |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
Discrete Mathematics ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) |
||||
Instructions |
||||
Assessment Type : Individual Assignment |
||||
Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an |
||||
application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . |
||||
This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor |
||||
of IT degree. |
||||
|
||||
Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student will be tested on their skills on |
||||
writing literature review of a topic student have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course |
||||
in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with |
||||
application to Information Technology and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one |
||||
application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a |
||||
complete account of that interest. |
||||
|
||||
Student can use the following database to find article or books. |
||||
o EBSCO Databases |
||||
o Emerald Insight |
||||
o IBISWorld |
||||
o IGI Global |
||||
o ProQuest eBooks |
||||
o O’Reilly Learnin g |
||||
|
||||
Student will be exploring and analysis the application of information technology related to the topic |
||||
which are identified by him/her , and he/she must recognise an application that can be programmed |
||||
into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs |
||||
to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the |
||||
algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student must write on e |
||||
report on its findings. |
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Student can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , |
||||
consult with your tutor. |
||||
The topic student group can choose from are : |
||||
• Number system used in Computing |
||||
• Logic in computing |
||||
• Inverse Function in Computing |
||||
• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n |
||||
• 16-bit representation |
||||
• Cryptography |
||||
|
||||
The written report must have the following sections: |
||||
1. Introduction |
||||
2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books |
||||
3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses |
||||
|
||||
4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested. |
||||
Write a complete account of that interest |
||||
5. Description of why students choose this application |
||||
6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of |
||||
flow -chart |
||||
7. Write an appropriate algorithm |
||||
8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input. |
||||
9. Conclusion |
||||
10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member |
||||
11. References |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday 18th May 2024, 11.59pm via Moodle. |
||||
The report must be: |
||||
1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long) |
||||
2. Size: A4 |
||||
3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature |
||||
4. Single space |
||||
5. Font: Calibri, 11pt |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Deduction, Late Submission and Extension |
||||
Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is |
||||
approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline. |
||||
|
||||
Plagiarism |
||||
Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the |
||||
statement: |
||||
|
||||
“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for |
||||
a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases. |
||||
Exclusion has serious visa implications.” |
||||
|
||||
“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work |
||||
in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All |
||||
students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating |
||||
that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic |
||||
misconduct and can attract severe penalties: |
||||
• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied |
||||
from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic |
||||
source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines. |
||||
• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may |
||||
be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” |
||||
• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment is considered as plagiarism. |
||||
|
||||
Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual Assignment) ; Value 50% |
||||
|
||||
Criteria Fail |
||||
(0 – 49%) Pass |
||||
(50 – 64%) Credit |
||||
(65 – 74%) Distinction |
||||
(75 – 84%) High Distinction |
||||
(85 – 100%) |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Topic |
||||
4 marks |
||||
Inaccurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Basic |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description of |
||||
the Topic and |
||||
some |
||||
connections |
||||
with |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology Polished |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Evidence of depth of |
||||
research with reference |
||||
6 marks Little or no |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references |
||||
with |
||||
explanations |
||||
of |
||||
connections |
||||
to the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references and |
||||
clear |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
refere nces |
||||
and polished |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic |
||||
Identifying an application |
||||
of Information |
||||
Technology relevant to |
||||
the topic |
||||
2 mark Little or no |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Basic |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Accurate |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Detail and |
||||
complete |
||||
account of |
||||
application |
||||
of the topic |
||||
to the |
||||
information |
||||
technology |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Information technology |
||||
application(s) |
||||
6 marks Inaccurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Basic |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description of |
||||
application of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and some |
||||
connections |
||||
with relevant |
||||
topics Polished |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
relevant |
||||
theories |
||||
Detail description of the |
||||
choice of the application |
||||
7 marks Little or no |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit. Basic |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Design a plane for |
||||
computer |
||||
implementation |
||||
7 marks Plane is not |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
no flow -chart |
||||
is given Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
flow -chart is |
||||
also given Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
plane is given |
||||
with a correct |
||||
flow -chart Appropriate |
||||
plane with |
||||
correct flow - |
||||
chart and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail is |
||||
given. |
||||
Writing an algorithm |
||||
7 marks Inaccurate |
||||
algorithm or |
||||
algorithm is |
||||
given in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm but |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
appropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
little discussion Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
complete |
||||
discussion |
||||
Conclusions |
||||
7 mark s Little or no |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Basic |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of the |
||||
algorithm Complete |
||||
analysis and |
||||
justification |
||||
of accuracy |
||||
of the |
||||
algorithm |
||||
Presentation |
||||
1 mark Poorly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
unclear |
||||
structure Well |
||||
organised |
||||
report but |
||||
with some |
||||
errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
few errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report and |
||||
good use of |
||||
tables and |
||||
graphs Polished |
||||
report and |
||||
creative use |
||||
of tables and |
||||
graphs |
||||
Presentation |
||||
5 marks Poor quality |
||||
of slides or |
||||
poor |
||||
performance |
||||
of |
||||
presentation Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but some |
||||
error Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but one or |
||||
two error Well prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
correctly Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
explicitly |
||||
with quality. |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Total Mark: / 25 |
||||
|
||||
25% |
||||
COMMENTS: |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
Discrete Mathematics ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) |
||||
Instructions |
||||
Assessment Type : Individual Assignment |
||||
Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an |
||||
application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . |
||||
This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor |
||||
of IT degree. |
||||
|
||||
Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student will be tested on their skills on |
||||
writing literature review of a topic student have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course |
||||
in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with |
||||
application to Information Technology and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one |
||||
application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a |
||||
complete account of that interest. |
||||
|
||||
Student can use the following database to find article or books. |
||||
o EBSCO Databases |
||||
o Emerald Insight |
||||
o IBISWorld |
||||
o IGI Global |
||||
o ProQuest eBooks |
||||
o O’Reilly Learnin g |
||||
|
||||
Student will be exploring and analysis the application of information technology related to the topic |
||||
which are identified by him/her , and he/she must recognise an application that can be programmed |
||||
into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs |
||||
to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the |
||||
algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student must write on e |
||||
report on its findings. |
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Student can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , |
||||
consult with your tutor. |
||||
The topic student group can choose from are : |
||||
• Number system used in Computing |
||||
• Logic in computing |
||||
• Inverse Function in Computing |
||||
• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n |
||||
• 16-bit representation |
||||
• Cryptography |
||||
|
||||
The written report must have the following sections: |
||||
1. Introduction |
||||
2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books |
||||
3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses |
||||
|
||||
4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested. |
||||
Write a complete account of that interest |
||||
5. Description of why students choose this application |
||||
6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of |
||||
flow -chart |
||||
7. Write an appropriate algorithm |
||||
8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input. |
||||
9. Conclusion |
||||
10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member |
||||
11. References |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday 18th May 2024, 11.59pm via Moodle. |
||||
The report must be: |
||||
1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long) |
||||
2. Size: A4 |
||||
3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature |
||||
4. Single space |
||||
5. Font: Calibri, 11pt |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Deduction, Late Submission and Extension |
||||
Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is |
||||
approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline. |
||||
|
||||
Plagiarism |
||||
Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the |
||||
statement: |
||||
|
||||
“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for |
||||
a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases. |
||||
Exclusion has serious visa implications.” |
||||
|
||||
“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work |
||||
in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All |
||||
students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating |
||||
that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic |
||||
misconduct and can attract severe penalties: |
||||
• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied |
||||
from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic |
||||
source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines. |
||||
• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may |
||||
be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” |
||||
• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment is considered as plagiarism. |
||||
|
||||
Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual Assignment) ; Value 50% |
||||
|
||||
Criteria Fail |
||||
(0 – 49%) Pass |
||||
(50 – 64%) Credit |
||||
(65 – 74%) Distinction |
||||
(75 – 84%) High Distinction |
||||
(85 – 100%) |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Topic |
||||
4 marks |
||||
Inaccurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Basic |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description of |
||||
the Topic and |
||||
some |
||||
connections |
||||
with |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology Polished |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Evidence of depth of |
||||
research with reference |
||||
6 marks Little or no |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references |
||||
with |
||||
explanations |
||||
of |
||||
connections |
||||
to the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references and |
||||
clear |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
refere nces |
||||
and polished |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic |
||||
Identifying an application |
||||
of Information |
||||
Technology relevant to |
||||
the topic |
||||
2 mark Little or no |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Basic |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Accurate |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Detail and |
||||
complete |
||||
account of |
||||
application |
||||
of the topic |
||||
to the |
||||
information |
||||
technology |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Information technology |
||||
application(s) |
||||
6 marks Inaccurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Basic |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description of |
||||
application of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and some |
||||
connections |
||||
with relevant |
||||
topics Polished |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
relevant |
||||
theories |
||||
Detail description of the |
||||
choice of the application |
||||
7 marks Little or no |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit. Basic |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Design a plane for |
||||
computer |
||||
implementation |
||||
7 marks Plane is not |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
no flow -chart |
||||
is given Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
flow -chart is |
||||
also given Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
plane is given |
||||
with a correct |
||||
flow -chart Appropriate |
||||
plane with |
||||
correct flow - |
||||
chart and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail is |
||||
given. |
||||
Writing an algorithm |
||||
7 marks Inaccurate |
||||
algorithm or |
||||
algorithm is |
||||
given in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm but |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
appropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
little discussion Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
complete |
||||
discussion |
||||
Conclusions |
||||
7 mark s Little or no |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Basic |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of the |
||||
algorithm Complete |
||||
analysis and |
||||
justification |
||||
of accuracy |
||||
of the |
||||
algorithm |
||||
Presentation |
||||
1 mark Poorly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
unclear |
||||
structure Well |
||||
organised |
||||
report but |
||||
with some |
||||
errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
few errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report and |
||||
good use of |
||||
tables and |
||||
graphs Polished |
||||
report and |
||||
creative use |
||||
of tables and |
||||
graphs |
||||
Presentation |
||||
5 marks Poor quality |
||||
of slides or |
||||
poor |
||||
performance |
||||
of |
||||
presentation Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but some |
||||
error Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but one or |
||||
two error Well prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
correctly Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
explicitly |
||||
with quality. |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Total Mark: / 25 |
||||
|
||||
25% |
||||
COMMENTS: |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 94 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 94 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
Discrete Mathematics ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) |
||||
Instructions |
||||
Assessment Type : Individual Assignment |
||||
Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an |
||||
application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . |
||||
This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor |
||||
of IT degree. |
||||
|
||||
Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student will be tested on their skills on |
||||
writing literature review of a topic student have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course |
||||
in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with |
||||
application to Information Technology and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one |
||||
application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a |
||||
complete account of that interest. |
||||
|
||||
Student can use the following database to find article or books. |
||||
o EBSCO Databases |
||||
o Emerald Insight |
||||
o IBISWorld |
||||
o IGI Global |
||||
o ProQuest eBooks |
||||
o O’Reilly Learnin g |
||||
|
||||
Student will be exploring and analysis the application of information technology related to the topic |
||||
which are identified by him/her , and he/she must recognise an application that can be programmed |
||||
into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs |
||||
to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the |
||||
algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student must write on e |
||||
report on its findings. |
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Student can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , |
||||
consult with your tutor. |
||||
The topic student group can choose from are : |
||||
• Number system used in Computing |
||||
• Logic in computing |
||||
• Inverse Function in Computing |
||||
• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n |
||||
• 16-bit representation |
||||
• Cryptography |
||||
|
||||
The written report must have the following sections: |
||||
1. Introduction |
||||
2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books |
||||
3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses |
||||
|
||||
4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested. |
||||
Write a complete account of that interest |
||||
5. Description of why students choose this application |
||||
6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of |
||||
flow -chart |
||||
7. Write an appropriate algorithm |
||||
8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input. |
||||
9. Conclusion |
||||
10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member |
||||
11. References |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday 18th May 2024, 11.59pm via Moodle. |
||||
The report must be: |
||||
1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long) |
||||
2. Size: A4 |
||||
3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature |
||||
4. Single space |
||||
5. Font: Calibri, 11pt |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Deduction, Late Submission and Extension |
||||
Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is |
||||
approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline. |
||||
|
||||
Plagiarism |
||||
Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the |
||||
statement: |
||||
|
||||
“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for |
||||
a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases. |
||||
Exclusion has serious visa implications.” |
||||
|
||||
“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work |
||||
in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All |
||||
students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating |
||||
that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic |
||||
misconduct and can attract severe penalties: |
||||
• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied |
||||
from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic |
||||
source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines. |
||||
• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may |
||||
be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” |
||||
• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment is considered as plagiarism. |
||||
|
||||
Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual Assignment) ; Value 50% |
||||
|
||||
Criteria Fail |
||||
(0 – 49%) Pass |
||||
(50 – 64%) Credit |
||||
(65 – 74%) Distinction |
||||
(75 – 84%) High Distinction |
||||
(85 – 100%) |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Topic |
||||
4 marks |
||||
Inaccurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Basic |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description of |
||||
the Topic and |
||||
some |
||||
connections |
||||
with |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology Polished |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Evidence of depth of |
||||
research with reference |
||||
6 marks Little or no |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references |
||||
with |
||||
explanations |
||||
of |
||||
connections |
||||
to the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references and |
||||
clear |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
refere nces |
||||
and polished |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic |
||||
Identifying an application |
||||
of Information |
||||
Technology relevant to |
||||
the topic |
||||
2 mark Little or no |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Basic |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Accurate |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Detail and |
||||
complete |
||||
account of |
||||
application |
||||
of the topic |
||||
to the |
||||
information |
||||
technology |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Information technology |
||||
application(s) |
||||
6 marks Inaccurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Basic |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description of |
||||
application of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and some |
||||
connections |
||||
with relevant |
||||
topics Polished |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
relevant |
||||
theories |
||||
Detail description of the |
||||
choice of the application |
||||
7 marks Little or no |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit. Basic |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Design a plane for |
||||
computer |
||||
implementation |
||||
7 marks Plane is not |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
no flow -chart |
||||
is given Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
flow -chart is |
||||
also given Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
plane is given |
||||
with a correct |
||||
flow -chart Appropriate |
||||
plane with |
||||
correct flow - |
||||
chart and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail is |
||||
given. |
||||
Writing an algorithm |
||||
7 marks Inaccurate |
||||
algorithm or |
||||
algorithm is |
||||
given in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm but |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
appropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
little discussion Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
complete |
||||
discussion |
||||
Conclusions |
||||
7 mark s Little or no |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Basic |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of the |
||||
algorithm Complete |
||||
analysis and |
||||
justification |
||||
of accuracy |
||||
of the |
||||
algorithm |
||||
Presentation |
||||
1 mark Poorly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
unclear |
||||
structure Well |
||||
organised |
||||
report but |
||||
with some |
||||
errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
few errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report and |
||||
good use of |
||||
tables and |
||||
graphs Polished |
||||
report and |
||||
creative use |
||||
of tables and |
||||
graphs |
||||
Presentation |
||||
5 marks Poor quality |
||||
of slides or |
||||
poor |
||||
performance |
||||
of |
||||
presentation Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but some |
||||
error Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but one or |
||||
two error Well prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
correctly Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
explicitly |
||||
with quality. |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Total Mark: / 25 |
||||
|
||||
25% |
||||
COMMENTS: |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 94 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 94 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
Discrete Mathematics ICT101 Assessment 3 ( 50%) |
||||
Instructions |
||||
Assessment Type : Individual Assignment |
||||
Purpose of the assessment : To develop a plan for a real -world example of an |
||||
application in information technology from the one of the topics given below . |
||||
This assessment contributes to the various learning outcomes of your Bachelor |
||||
of IT degree. |
||||
|
||||
Assessment Task : In the initial part of assignment, the student will be tested on their skills on |
||||
writing literature review of a topic student have learnt in the Discrete Mathematics (ICT101) course |
||||
in the week 1 to 6. Students need to read at least 3 articles or bo oks on this topic especially with |
||||
application to Information Technology and give detail review of those. Student will also identify one |
||||
application of information Technology related to the topic in which he/she is interested and write a |
||||
complete account of that interest. |
||||
|
||||
Student can use the following database to find article or books. |
||||
o EBSCO Databases |
||||
o Emerald Insight |
||||
o IBISWorld |
||||
o IGI Global |
||||
o ProQuest eBooks |
||||
o O’Reilly Learnin g |
||||
|
||||
Student will be exploring and analysis the application of information technology related to the topic |
||||
which are identified by him/her , and he/she must recognise an application that can be programmed |
||||
into computer. Each group must sketch a plane to draw a flow -chart and algorithm. Use some inputs |
||||
to test the algorithm (Give different trace table for each input) and identify any problem in the |
||||
algorithm. Suggest a plane to rectify or explain why it can ’t be rectified. Each student must write on e |
||||
report on its findings. |
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Student can choose one from the following Topic. However, after deciding on the topic to work on , |
||||
consult with your tutor. |
||||
The topic student group can choose from are : |
||||
• Number system used in Computing |
||||
• Logic in computing |
||||
• Inverse Function in Computing |
||||
• Induction Proof and its computing applicatio n |
||||
• 16-bit representation |
||||
• Cryptography |
||||
|
||||
The written report must have the following sections: |
||||
1. Introduction |
||||
2. Proper reference of at least three articles or books |
||||
3. Write detail review of those articles or books related to the topic student chooses |
||||
|
||||
4. Identify one application in Information Technology in which student is interested. |
||||
Write a complete account of that interest |
||||
5. Description of why students choose this application |
||||
6. Give a complete plane to implement the application into a computer program with use of |
||||
flow -chart |
||||
7. Write an appropriate algorithm |
||||
8. Use at least two inputs to test the algor ithm. Group need to give a trace table for each input. |
||||
9. Conclusion |
||||
10. Short statement about contributions/Reflections from each group member |
||||
11. References |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Deadline to submit written report: On or before Sunday 18th May 2024, 11.59pm via Moodle. |
||||
The report must be: |
||||
1. Word or pdf document (3 to 4 pages long) |
||||
2. Size: A4 |
||||
3. Use Assignment Cover Page (download from Moodle) with your details and signature |
||||
4. Single space |
||||
5. Font: Calibri, 11pt |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Deduction, Late Submission and Extension |
||||
Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is |
||||
approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline. |
||||
|
||||
Plagiarism |
||||
Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the |
||||
statement: |
||||
|
||||
“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for |
||||
a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases. |
||||
Exclusion has serious visa implications.” |
||||
|
||||
“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work |
||||
in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All |
||||
students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating |
||||
that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic |
||||
misconduct and can attract severe penalties: |
||||
• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied |
||||
from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic |
||||
source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines. |
||||
• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may |
||||
be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ” |
||||
• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment is considered as plagiarism. |
||||
|
||||
Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual Assignment) ; Value 50% |
||||
|
||||
Criteria Fail |
||||
(0 – 49%) Pass |
||||
(50 – 64%) Credit |
||||
(65 – 74%) Distinction |
||||
(75 – 84%) High Distinction |
||||
(85 – 100%) |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Topic |
||||
4 marks |
||||
Inaccurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Basic |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic Accurate |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description of |
||||
the Topic and |
||||
some |
||||
connections |
||||
with |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology Polished |
||||
mathematical |
||||
description |
||||
of the Topic |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
Information |
||||
Technology |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Evidence of depth of |
||||
research with reference |
||||
6 marks Little or no |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references Some |
||||
relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references |
||||
with |
||||
explanations |
||||
of |
||||
connections |
||||
to the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
references and |
||||
clear |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic Relevant |
||||
reading and |
||||
refere nces |
||||
and polished |
||||
connections |
||||
illuminating |
||||
the Topic |
||||
Identifying an application |
||||
of Information |
||||
Technology relevant to |
||||
the topic |
||||
2 mark Little or no |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Basic |
||||
connection |
||||
between the |
||||
topic and the |
||||
application Accurate |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
application of |
||||
the topic to |
||||
the |
||||
information |
||||
technology Detail and |
||||
complete |
||||
account of |
||||
application |
||||
of the topic |
||||
to the |
||||
information |
||||
technology |
||||
Understanding of the |
||||
Information technology |
||||
application(s) |
||||
6 marks Inaccurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Basic |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description |
||||
of application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology Accurate |
||||
description of |
||||
application of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and some |
||||
connections |
||||
with relevant |
||||
topics Polished |
||||
description |
||||
of |
||||
application |
||||
of |
||||
information |
||||
Technology |
||||
and |
||||
references to |
||||
relevant |
||||
theories |
||||
Detail description of the |
||||
choice of the application |
||||
7 marks Little or no |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit. Basic |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice. Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis Accurate |
||||
evidence is |
||||
given for the |
||||
choice and |
||||
omit with |
||||
relevant |
||||
analysis and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Design a plane for |
||||
computer |
||||
implementation |
||||
7 marks Plane is not |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
no flow -chart |
||||
is given Plane is |
||||
designed in a |
||||
proper |
||||
manner and |
||||
flow -chart is |
||||
also given Accurate and |
||||
comprehensive |
||||
plane is given |
||||
with a correct |
||||
flow -chart Appropriate |
||||
plane with |
||||
correct flow - |
||||
chart and |
||||
complete |
||||
detail is |
||||
given. |
||||
Writing an algorithm |
||||
7 marks Inaccurate |
||||
algorithm or |
||||
algorithm is |
||||
given in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm but |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
appropriate |
||||
manner Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
little discussion Correct |
||||
algorithm |
||||
which is |
||||
written in an |
||||
inappropriate |
||||
manner with |
||||
complete |
||||
discussion |
||||
Conclusions |
||||
7 mark s Little or no |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Basic |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of |
||||
the algorithm Accurate |
||||
evidence of |
||||
accuracy of the |
||||
algorithm Complete |
||||
analysis and |
||||
justification |
||||
of accuracy |
||||
of the |
||||
algorithm |
||||
Presentation |
||||
1 mark Poorly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
unclear |
||||
structure Well |
||||
organised |
||||
report but |
||||
with some |
||||
errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report with |
||||
few errors Clearly |
||||
organised |
||||
report and |
||||
good use of |
||||
tables and |
||||
graphs Polished |
||||
report and |
||||
creative use |
||||
of tables and |
||||
graphs |
||||
Presentation |
||||
5 marks Poor quality |
||||
of slides or |
||||
poor |
||||
performance |
||||
of |
||||
presentation Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but some |
||||
error Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
but one or |
||||
two error Well prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
correctly Well |
||||
prepared |
||||
presentation |
||||
without an |
||||
error and |
||||
explain |
||||
everything |
||||
explicitly |
||||
with quality. |
Binary file not shown.
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024 |
||||
Total Mark: / 25 |
||||
|
||||
25% |
||||
COMMENTS: |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 94 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in new issue