You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
63 lines
2.3 KiB
63 lines
2.3 KiB
6 months ago
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Assessment 3 Instructions INT2024
|
||
|
|
Deduction, Late Submission and Extension
|
||
|
|
Late submission penalty: - 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is
|
||
|
|
approved. For extension application procedure, please refer to Section 3.3 of the Subject Outline.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Plagiarism
|
||
|
|
Please read Section 3.4 Plagiarism and Refere ncing, from the Subject Outline. Below is part of the
|
||
|
|
statement:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
“Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for
|
||
|
|
a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serio us repeat cases.
|
||
|
|
Exclusion has serious visa implications.”
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
“Authorship is also an issue under Plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work
|
||
|
|
in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group pr oject. All
|
||
|
|
students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating
|
||
|
|
that the work submitted is their own original work. The following are examples of academic
|
||
|
|
misconduct and can attract severe penalties:
|
||
|
|
• Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied
|
||
|
|
from another student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic
|
||
|
|
source, is fraud, and falls under the general Plagiarism guidelines.
|
||
|
|
• Students who willingl y allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may
|
||
|
|
be considered to assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied. ”
|
||
|
|
• Any form of AI usage such as ChatGPT in your assessment is considered as plagiarism.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Marking Rubric for Assessment N. 03 (Individual Assignment) ; Value 50%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Criteria Fail
|
||
|
|
(0 – 49%) Pass
|
||
|
|
(50 – 64%) Credit
|
||
|
|
(65 – 74%) Distinction
|
||
|
|
(75 – 84%) High Distinction
|
||
|
|
(85 – 100%)
|
||
|
|
Understanding of the
|
||
|
|
Topic
|
||
|
|
4 marks
|
||
|
|
Inaccurate
|
||
|
|
mathematical
|
||
|
|
description
|
||
|
|
of the Topic Basic
|
||
|
|
mathematical
|
||
|
|
description
|
||
|
|
of the Topic Accurate
|
||
|
|
mathematical
|
||
|
|
description
|
||
|
|
of the Topic Accurate
|
||
|
|
mathematical
|
||
|
|
description of
|
||
|
|
the Topic and
|
||
|
|
some
|
||
|
|
connections
|
||
|
|
with
|
||
|
|
Information
|
||
|
|
Technology Polished
|
||
|
|
mathematical
|
||
|
|
description
|
||
|
|
of the Topic
|
||
|
|
and
|
||
|
|
references to
|
||
|
|
Information
|
||
|
|
Technology
|